Rants
Questions
Soapbox
Best Practices
Apply today for a FREE subscription to CIO Magazine!
Fri, Aug 1, 2008 12:44 EDT

|
Posted by: Al Sacco in Questions Topic: Personal ManagementBlog: Mobile WorkHorse
Current Rating: |
I don't know about you, but the thought of being crammed into a middle seat between two folks yapping away on cell phones during a flight literally sends spasms down my spine.
I'm not a small man, by any means, and it's hard enough for me to travel nowadays, between the ever-decreasing legroom in coach—first class, isn't that some kind of overnight mail?—and the fact that I can't sit still long enough to make it through a single episode of Seinfeld anyway. In my personal case, in-flight calling would be a form or torture akin to water boarding. (I jest, but you get the point…)
Earlier this year, I wrote a blog post/rant extrapolating on how the idea of ubiquitous Wi-Fi—and therein VoWi-Fi calling--on public buses, trains and airplanes was about as attractive to me as staring at the sun during a solar eclipse. Over the past four months, my thoughts on the subject have only become more vehement: In my opinion, an airplane, bus or train without a "no calling section" is the equivalent of an all-smoking plane—in both cases, I'd be stuck sitting next to a bunch of callers/smokers with no way means of egress.
My problem is not really with folks who might be using Wi-Fi to catch up on e-mail or surf the Web, though I have my reservations about them, as well. These are both solitary activities in which people can keep to themselves—and plenty of folks are already using laptops, UMPCs and smartphones to play games or watch movies during flights. The problem comes into play when the activities of others encroach on my ability to peacefully count the seconds until I can stretch out my legs and fully exhale. In-flight calling systems—VoWi-Fi or otherwise--and cellular zones fall into the later category.
Sure, those clunky wired in-flight phones have been available for years, but the inconvenience and price of employing them have largely restricted their use to emergency situations only.
I decided to revisit this subject because of an act that's currently making its way through the U.S. Congress. The Halting Airplane Noise to Give Us Peace (HANG UP) Act, which was approved via voice vote by the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee on Thursday, according to the IDG News Service, would extend and make permanent an existing Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Federal Communication Commission (FCC) ban that makes in-flight cellular calling by passengers illegal.
The associated House of Representatives bill, called H.R. 5788, is now set to move on to the House for full approval, and companion legislation also would need the thumbs up from both the Senate and President Bush before becoming official. A related measure that's part of another FAA movement is already in the Senate, the IDGNS says.
In my last post on the subject, I included a poll to determine where my readers stand on the subject of Wi-Fi—not just cellular calling zones or VoIP--and public transportation. The results of that poll can be broken down as such:
Though the majority of voters said they're willing to deal with negatives aspects of Wi-Fi access on public transportation in order
I'm with the author on this one - I travel extensively - 80,000 miles so far this year, and would switch from my current airline if they allow phones on aircraft. It's bad enough to get stuck CLOSE to somebody who talks too loudly - can you imagine 3/4 of the passengers all talking at once? I'm dead set against the idea.
Planes are not conducive to private conversations, let alone critical business meetings. With the forced proximity, zero privacy, and therefore zero security, the flight stresses and anxieties many feel, and truly no room to work (laptop OR notepad, but not both, and only if you pre-arranged that decision before you sat down!), I have to ask, to what great need is there to override these risks and unprofessionalism?
Further, planes are one of the last few places where you can still be "unplugged" from the "always-on" mentality.
Mark me down for a big thumbs-down.
Planes are already not conducive to private conversations as it is. With forced proximity, zero privacy, and therefore zero security, the fears and anxieties that some feel while flying, and no room to actually work (laptop OR notepad ... maybe...but certainly not both), that's a lot of opportunity for unprofessional behaviors and expectations.
Planes are one of the last few places where you can still be "unplugged" from the "always-on" mentality, and for legitimate reasons!
Mark me down for a thumbs-down.