Apply today for a FREE subscription to CIO Magazine!
Mon, Aug 18, 2008 14:29 EDT

|
Posted by: Al Sacco in Soapbox Topic: InfrastructureBlog: Mobile WorkHorse
Current Rating: |
Research In Motion (RIM) is expected to release its much anticipated, 3G smartphone, the BlackBerry Bold, in North America within the coming weeks, but the steep price tag tied to the new device just may come as a surprise to many of the folks eagerly awaiting its release. Not me, though...and here's why.
The BlackBerry Bold is already shipping in some countries, including Australia, Austria, Germany and Turkey, mostly to business customers, so pricing specifics are sparse. The new RIM smartphone isn't officially available anywhere in North America, though rumors and other details regarding pricing are bouncing around the Web. In fact, just last week a leaked document from Canadian carrier Rogers hit the Web, bringing the news that the Rogers BlackBerry Bold will retail for $399 along with a three-year contract. Rogers is expected to begin selling the device later this month.
Rogers has traditionally priced its BlackBerry devices a bit higher than its U.S. peers, but the official Bold price came as a shock to a lot of BlackBerry loyalists and smartphone watchers, many of whom had expected a significantly lower price due to the fact the Bold-rival iPhone 3G 8GB sells for half that price along with a two-year AT&T contract. (The 16GB iPhone 3G is also cheaper, at just $299 with a two-year contract.) Some bloggers even played on the Canadian carrier's name, affectionately dubbing the company "Robbers."
When I first heard that Rogers planned to charge $399 for the Bold along with a three-year contract, I couldn't help but laugh. That's a lot of money—enough to keep me from upgrading if I was a Rogers customer. Then, because I have quite a few BlackBerry-addicted associates north of the U.S. border who are Rogers subscribers, I started to feel sorry for them, not only because $400 is very pricey for a new smartphone, but also because they'll need to sign a new three-year contract instead of just the two-year commitment that most U.S. carriers require. (T-Mobile Germany subscribers are paying what amounts to just under US$200, as well, so Rogers's pricing seems all the more steep.)
But then, the more I thought about Rogers' pricing decision, the more it began to make sense--and the more sure I became that AT&T will indeed release the device with a similar price tag, though I can't see the U.S. carrier requiring more than a two-year service contract.
Right now, RIM is trying to find a balance between catering to its traditional customer base, enterprises, and the newly-tapped consumer market. Over the past decade or so, RIM earned a reputation as a company that makes durable and reliable business devices, and it has blossomed into the smartphone giant it is today because of this. RIM is slowly moving away from businesses and embracing consumers with new devices meant to meet their specific needs—though the Bold admittedly crosses into both territories. RIM needs to be careful not to alienate those same businesses that lifted it to its current stature in the smartphone world.
RIM's number one concern must remain the business customer—at least until it more firmly plants its feet in the consumer market. That means not only creating devices with enterprise-oriented features missing from rival offerings, but also continuing to create the BlackBerry mystique that has thus far set the smartphones apart.
Until last year, many BlackBerry users
No one is as elitist as an apple enthusiast. The main reason it will never fly right off the bat is because people need the qwerty keyboards on those devices. Most men i know have a heck of a time using the keyboard on the iPhone. it's terrible.
Function first.
Well, things differ for different observers, it seems. Most people I've seen using an iPhone are men, approximately 40% of them are Mac users, and none of them complained about the keyboard. They complain about the camera or a particular VPN-flavor they need or the missing copy-paste function, but never the keyboard. Isn't that odd?
Cellphones are no longer status symbols. NOT having to carry a cell phone because other people answer your calls is a status symbol. Cell phones are constantly changing and disposable. Spending $400 on a BB is foolish and will make the owner look stupid especially when the NEXT BB is released. Early adopters always get screwed in the end. So do BMW owners. I drive a Nissan, and save enough to buy this phone, but I am still happy with my BB 8830.
Ya know, I listen to these debates all the time by my developers regarding which is better; the blackberry or the iPhone. Personally, I think they're both great, just in different ways. At work we have a Blackberry Enterprise Server so I use my Curve happily during the work week. However, when I get home at night or on the weekends I use my iPhone, not because I think its a status symbol, because I am a Mac user. I personally dont want any work emails coming through on my off hours with my family.
I have my personal email set up on my iPhone, a limited contact list of family and friends, iTunes, and some pictures of my wife and kids. It's nice when I have to run to the supermarket or something that I can bring just one device and be able to do everything (listen to songs, call home, talk to friends, whatever) without having to carry around two things (iPod, Blackberry, etc.)
I think that people spend a lot of time debating about things as unimportant as this. Use what you like and be happy about it. Let people use what they like and let them live without hearing what you think. Everyone has their own preferences and likes... that's life.
Its absolutely true about how not having a cell phone is a status symbol. The CEO of my company never carries a cell phone. You have to call his assistant or driver or whatever and tell THEM what you want and he'll call you back when he's damn well good and ready. That's pretty sweet! Us lowly CIO's are always tied to a device it seems because IT employees are never done emailing and texting you about some disaster.
Hello Steven and Anonymous,
Thank you for your comments. They're appreciated.
However, I think you're both kind of missing the point of my post. I was not trying to prove that the BlackBerry Bold is better than the Apple iPhone 3G or vice versa. I completely agree that they're tools meant for (mostly) different purposes and should be treated as such. But since both device makers are targeting an increasingly similar audience, they're searching for ways to differentiate their wares.
Price is a great differentiator, and that is the point of my post; while Apple is attempting to broaden its iPhone customer base by dropping the price of the iPhone 3G so it's more affordable, RIM and its carrier partners are trying to secure the Bold as the high-end smartphone for executives by pricing it outside the budgets of typical consumer smartphone users. With that high price tag comes a certain level of exclusivity. And like it or not, that exclusivity will be seen by many as a symbol of status.
RIM has plenty of other more consumer-oriented devices in the pipeline, and it will go after potential iPhone users in the future with these devices, not the Bold.
AS