Open Source Windows?
I had to laugh at Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols tongue-in-cheek suggestion that Microsoft could solve its Vista uptake and quality problems by open sourcing the OS.
Hiding behind his suggestion is the reality that, despite putting thousands of people and billions of dollars into it, Vista doesn't seem to deliver high quality -- this despite several years of Microsoft's commitment to quality (in fact, at one point, they used the quality initiative as a reason for one of the many delays to the product).
Of course, despite its lack of quality, the OS doesn't really deliver much in terms of features, either, as I described in an earlier post. I mean, after five years of trying, transparent icons of your open windows and widgets on the desktop?
What I think is really interesting about Steven's blog posting is his quite rational diagnosis of Microsoft's problems and prescription to address them: let open source coders loose on the product so that the benefits of open source development can be applied to solve the problems.
Open source development methodologies have shown that they fix bugs quickly, rather than letting them fester for years. Open source also allows end users to solve problems that those who control the product don't understand or care to fix themselves.
In the abstract, Steven's ideas have merit, but they founder on one central reality: they conflict with Microsoft's business model, and when user needs and business models clash, business models win every time.
After all, what end user demanded Vista's byzantine hardware security mechanism? The answer is no-one. Hollywood content providers influenced Microsoft, which was willing to listen to them rather than the millions of end users that are inconvenienced by the feature. On the other hand, Microsoft is looking to form lots of business relationships with those providers for other products and services: Zune, Xbox, the inevitable DRM-friendly response to YouTube. In other words, Microsoft's business model trumps end user needs in the core software offerings.
This isn't just a rag on Microsoft rant. I mean, what else would you expect any rational commercial entity to do?
More to the point is where this need to protect its business model will take Microsoft.
By releasing a complex, expensive, light-featured, user-unfriendly feature intrusive, quality-compromised product, Microsoft is failing to meet the needs of its core user
Hiding behind his suggestion is the reality that, despite putting thousands of people and billions of dollars into it, Vista doesn't seem to deliver high quality -- this despite several years of Microsoft's commitment to quality (in fact, at one point, they used the quality initiative as a reason for one of the many delays to the product).
Of course, despite its lack of quality, the OS doesn't really deliver much in terms of features, either, as I described in an earlier post. I mean, after five years of trying, transparent icons of your open windows and widgets on the desktop?
What I think is really interesting about Steven's blog posting is his quite rational diagnosis of Microsoft's problems and prescription to address them: let open source coders loose on the product so that the benefits of open source development can be applied to solve the problems.
Open source development methodologies have shown that they fix bugs quickly, rather than letting them fester for years. Open source also allows end users to solve problems that those who control the product don't understand or care to fix themselves.
In the abstract, Steven's ideas have merit, but they founder on one central reality: they conflict with Microsoft's business model, and when user needs and business models clash, business models win every time.
After all, what end user demanded Vista's byzantine hardware security mechanism? The answer is no-one. Hollywood content providers influenced Microsoft, which was willing to listen to them rather than the millions of end users that are inconvenienced by the feature. On the other hand, Microsoft is looking to form lots of business relationships with those providers for other products and services: Zune, Xbox, the inevitable DRM-friendly response to YouTube. In other words, Microsoft's business model trumps end user needs in the core software offerings.
This isn't just a rag on Microsoft rant. I mean, what else would you expect any rational commercial entity to do?
More to the point is where this need to protect its business model will take Microsoft.
By releasing a complex, expensive, light-featured, user-unfriendly feature intrusive, quality-compromised product, Microsoft is failing to meet the needs of its core user
Previous Post: A Secret Weapon to Drive Top Line RevenueNext Post: This Windows boy grows up; Adopts Linux
Most Discussed Posts
In this paper we discuss some of the key challenges of requirements management and how organizations are addressing these challenges to increase their likelihood of success.
In this eGuide, CIO along with Network World, InfoWorld and CSO, cover the pertinent information security topics of today. Read on to learn how to deal with threats, build effective security strategies and prepare for increased scrutiny.
The state of the high tech services industry is in flux as never before. With changing patterns of software/solution consumption and pressure on traditional service delivery models increasing, many leaders "get it" and want to move services forward.
A SIP-based Unified Communications infrastructure can improve productivity by 23%. Learn where SIP comes from, how it works and why the time has come to move to SIP.
CDW's reference guides provide a high-level, informative take on today's most pressing IT solution areas and related issues.
This guide provide up-to-date summaries, strategic guidance and best practice tips on the technologies driving IT operations forward.
For organizations looking to start a content analytics program or improve their existing capabilities, Aberdeen Group and IBM will lay out several recommendations on how to become a best-in-class customer service organization.
Register now to listen to this video whitepaper and to learn more about the components of content analytics applications, emerging best practices, and the issues to consider before deploying content analytics technologies.
Technology is now intertwined with nearly every aspect of business. Information technology is not only pervasive; it is fast becoming a primary driver of market differentiation, business growth, and profitability.
This session will discuss how Ashurst, a top-tier legal service provider for private and public sector clients worldwide, was able to effectively manage organizational change and improve their profitability using IBM Business Analytics.
To help you make the most of Mobility, IDG and SAP have created a three-part Mobile Playbook series packed with data, insights, best practices, resources, and a checklist for developing a winning mobile strategy.
Learn how the State of Michigan is utilizing DeepSight security intelligence to protect critical infrastructure.
Sponsored Links
