Wired Asks the Wrong Question about Open Source
"Where are all the open source billionaires?" Wired asks in its March issue. Wrong question. The right question is "Who will become billionaires because of open source?"
Wired provides an eclectic mix of insight, commentary, and predictions about what's coming down the pike. I always enjoy reading it because it's thought-provoking and stimulating and mostly right. But it got it dead wrong about open source software last month. In its "Wired Business Tends 2008" the magazine's #1 trend is "Open Source Tycoons: The Sotware that Made Developers Cool can now Make Them Rich." It goes on to discuss the potential for open source software riches and proclaims that big dollars are around the corner for open source entrepreneurs. (I'd provide a link to the article, but the Wired website doesn't seem to have the article, and has an impossibly lame search capability; how well does that square with a self-proclaimed role as the prophet of the digital revolution?)
Notwithstanding the recent acquisitions of several open source companies for significant sums (and I maintain their valuation was based on their strategic importance to the acquirers, not to their real economic value), there aren't going to be any open source billionaires. The whole point of open source is that it deflates the value of software -- that's the definition of commoditization. Open source companies will be good businesses but we will never see the Oracle equivalent in the open source world. Oracle and its brethren made their mark when the potential of computing was opening up and there was a shortage of software available to take advantage of it. Those conditions are now gone, as evinced by the fact that there are several open source alternatives to the Oracle database. The software shortage is over, so the opportunity for huge fortunes from software is over as well.
However, that doesn't mean that open source won't create new billionaires. Because the cost of software has plummeted, new companies are being formed that take advantage of open source to create new offerings -- and these new companies will build enormous fortunes on the back of open source. I refer to this phenomena as "the migration of margin." The enormous margin previously enjoyed by software is going to move to the new products and services made possible by open source software. If you want to see the billionaires of open source, you'll have to look elsewhere. In the next week or two, I'm going to discuss a few of these companies, ones that have leveraged open source to develop products and services that wouldn't be possible in a proprietary software world.
Meanwhile, to Wired: Sorry you got it so wrong, but the fate of a fortune teller is not often kind.
Print
Wired provides an eclectic mix of insight, commentary, and predictions about what's coming down the pike. I always enjoy reading it because it's thought-provoking and stimulating and mostly right. But it got it dead wrong about open source software last month. In its "Wired Business Tends 2008" the magazine's #1 trend is "Open Source Tycoons: The Sotware that Made Developers Cool can now Make Them Rich." It goes on to discuss the potential for open source software riches and proclaims that big dollars are around the corner for open source entrepreneurs. (I'd provide a link to the article, but the Wired website doesn't seem to have the article, and has an impossibly lame search capability; how well does that square with a self-proclaimed role as the prophet of the digital revolution?)
Notwithstanding the recent acquisitions of several open source companies for significant sums (and I maintain their valuation was based on their strategic importance to the acquirers, not to their real economic value), there aren't going to be any open source billionaires. The whole point of open source is that it deflates the value of software -- that's the definition of commoditization. Open source companies will be good businesses but we will never see the Oracle equivalent in the open source world. Oracle and its brethren made their mark when the potential of computing was opening up and there was a shortage of software available to take advantage of it. Those conditions are now gone, as evinced by the fact that there are several open source alternatives to the Oracle database. The software shortage is over, so the opportunity for huge fortunes from software is over as well.
However, that doesn't mean that open source won't create new billionaires. Because the cost of software has plummeted, new companies are being formed that take advantage of open source to create new offerings -- and these new companies will build enormous fortunes on the back of open source. I refer to this phenomena as "the migration of margin." The enormous margin previously enjoyed by software is going to move to the new products and services made possible by open source software. If you want to see the billionaires of open source, you'll have to look elsewhere. In the next week or two, I'm going to discuss a few of these companies, ones that have leveraged open source to develop products and services that wouldn't be possible in a proprietary software world.
Meanwhile, to Wired: Sorry you got it so wrong, but the fate of a fortune teller is not often kind.
Previous Post: Gartner: Windows is "Collapsing"Next Post: The Challenge Open Source Presents to CIOs
Most Discussed Posts
Cloud computing has emerged as one of the most significant game changers to hit the technology landscape in the past 20 years. With this massive expansion of the cloud, the perception of the IT organization is shifting from a utility player to a change agent. This eBook breaks down five ways progressive organizations are using cloud-based IT Management solutions to help drive innovation and become more strategic, including: adding visibility and analytics, speeding up time-to-value, lowering costs, improving prioritization, and providing a blueprint for future cloud deployments.
Read the white paper to see how IBM helped Citigroup deliver new services and enhancements to their 200 million customers faster.
There are 3 ways to modernize legacy applications: rewrite completely, acquire packaged solutions or migrate existing code. This paper explains why it's best to migrate and how IBM® Rational® software can help.
Accommodating specific lines of business can result in a hybrid ecosystem of applications and servers. The resulting complexity of this architecture makes for an environment that is costly to maintain and difficult to change when addressing new challenges.
This whitepaper will help you to define a mobile device passcode policy. Security managers must attempt to reconcile two opposing goals. They must: 1) create a passcode policy that is strong enough to protect the device if it is lost or stolen, while: 2) not annoying users with needless length or complexity.
This whitepaper, authored by The Radicati Group, looks at the key reasons organizations should consider moving to a cloud-based archiving solution. Email archiving solutions enable organizations to store, monitor, and collect electronic data exchanged by their users to comply with internal policies and regulations.
ATERNITY will showcase a 30-minute demo on how Fortune 500 companies are leveraging its award-winning FPI Platform to deliver a user-centric approach to Proactive IT Management.
For businesses to move forward and tap into the ever-expanding universe of Internet users and network-enabled devices, it's critical to learn how to make the transition to IPv6. Learn the critical steps your organization must take to make a seamless transition-and keep your business world connected.
Learn how IT teams can protect against spear phishing tactics. Harry Sverdlove, chief technology officer of Bit9 offers a frank discussion about spear phishing - the most common technique used in today's advanced attacks.
Learn how to build a solid business case for your migration to Red Hat Enterprise Linux so you can run leaner, innovate faster, be more flexible and own the New Now.
Social media isn't about you; it's about everything around you. As you consider how your customers want to communicate with you, social media is something that can't be ignored. But what should your strategy be? Is social media "just another channel?" What kind of a plan makes sense for your contact center and for your customers? Join our experts as they share their insight and research results.
Hardware tokens were a popular method of strong authentication in past years but the cumbersome provisioning and distribution tasks, high support requirements and replacement costs have limited their growth. The additional log-in steps that hardware tokens require and the resulting user frustrations have limited adoption and make them impractical for larger scale partner and customer applications.
Sponsored Links
