IBM’s Hidden U.S. Headcount Also Hides Its Offshoring Initiatives
In an apparent change of heart, IBM is no longer breaking out the number of U.S. employees it has.
Plenty has been said already about IBM’s shift in how it reports its employee headcount. In its most recent annual report, which you can see here, IBM provides only a global headcount of 399,409 employees instead of providing in specifics on the number of employees it has in the U.S.
For the most part, the talk has been critical. That’s not surprising. Most people don’t like it when companies keep secrets, even those secrets they are legally able to keep. For its part, IBM reportedly has said it’s only doing what most of its competitors already do.
For a great breakdown of IBM’s change of heart, read this story by Computerworld’s Patrick Thibodeau.
What I found particularly interesting is the commentary from Ron Hira, an associate professor of public policy at the Rochester Institute of Technology. Hira charges that IBM is hiding its offshoring, and in doing so is hiding workforce data that policymakers need to better understand how offshoring affects the U.S. market.
Moreover, Hira points out, IBM’s less-than-full disclosure seems to be in keeping with its opposition to President Barack Obama’s proposal to change the tax deferral rules, which could outlaw or restrict billions in tax breaks U.S. companies who offshore. (IBM isn’t the only company opposing these changes; others include Microsoft and Symantec.)
IBM’s shift to providing only global employee counts comes in an annual report that’s written about a year in which IBM apparently dropped some 10,000 U.S. workers. The annual report doesn’t necessarily reflect that number, however. The 10K layoff number is an estimate from the Alliance@IBM/CWA Local 1701, a worker union bargaining for employee rights. The annual report states that IBM finished up with more employees by 0.2%, or just short of 1,000, from 2008. Hmmm…
I get that IBM doesn’t legally have to break out its employee headcounts by region for you, or me, or shareholders, or anyone. But it has in the past. The shift seems a little odd at best. Really, why be so tightlipped IBM? It’s a simple HR task to break out the U.S. numbers. My guess is you’d rather the American public not know how many U.S. jobs may have been lost to offshoring.
What do you think, readers? Is this business as usual, a shady move, or perfectly legit?
Previous Post: Satyam Refuses to Become the Forgotten IT Services ProviderNext Post: More Companies Will Outsource in 2010, And For Far More Strategic Reasons
What is Tech Briefcase?
TechBriefcase is a new, free service where IT Professionals can Search, Store and Share IT white papers and content like this. Learn more
Bookmark content
Speed up your research efforts with content across the web.
Search and Store
Find the white papers you need. Create folders for any topic.
View Anywhere
Open your briefcase on your iPhone, tablet or desktop. Share with colleagues.
Most Discussed Posts
Cloud computing has emerged as one of the most significant game changers to hit the technology landscape in the past 20 years. With this massive expansion of the cloud, the perception of the IT organization is shifting from a utility player to a change agent. This eBook breaks down five ways progressive organizations are using cloud-based IT Management solutions to help drive innovation and become more strategic, including: adding visibility and analytics, speeding up time-to-value, lowering costs, improving prioritization, and providing a blueprint for future cloud deployments.
Read the white paper to see how IBM helped Citigroup deliver new services and enhancements to their 200 million customers faster.
There are 3 ways to modernize legacy applications: rewrite completely, acquire packaged solutions or migrate existing code. This paper explains why it's best to migrate and how IBM® Rational® software can help.
Accommodating specific lines of business can result in a hybrid ecosystem of applications and servers. The resulting complexity of this architecture makes for an environment that is costly to maintain and difficult to change when addressing new challenges.
This whitepaper will help you to define a mobile device passcode policy. Security managers must attempt to reconcile two opposing goals. They must: 1) create a passcode policy that is strong enough to protect the device if it is lost or stolen, while: 2) not annoying users with needless length or complexity.
This whitepaper, authored by The Radicati Group, looks at the key reasons organizations should consider moving to a cloud-based archiving solution. Email archiving solutions enable organizations to store, monitor, and collect electronic data exchanged by their users to comply with internal policies and regulations.
ATERNITY will showcase a 30-minute demo on how Fortune 500 companies are leveraging its award-winning FPI Platform to deliver a user-centric approach to Proactive IT Management.
For businesses to move forward and tap into the ever-expanding universe of Internet users and network-enabled devices, it's critical to learn how to make the transition to IPv6. Learn the critical steps your organization must take to make a seamless transition-and keep your business world connected.
Learn how IT teams can protect against spear phishing tactics. Harry Sverdlove, chief technology officer of Bit9 offers a frank discussion about spear phishing - the most common technique used in today's advanced attacks.
Learn how to build a solid business case for your migration to Red Hat Enterprise Linux so you can run leaner, innovate faster, be more flexible and own the New Now.
Social media isn't about you; it's about everything around you. As you consider how your customers want to communicate with you, social media is something that can't be ignored. But what should your strategy be? Is social media "just another channel?" What kind of a plan makes sense for your contact center and for your customers? Join our experts as they share their insight and research results.
Hardware tokens were a popular method of strong authentication in past years but the cumbersome provisioning and distribution tasks, high support requirements and replacement costs have limited their growth. The additional log-in steps that hardware tokens require and the resulting user frustrations have limited adoption and make them impractical for larger scale partner and customer applications.
Sponsored Links
