Rants
Questions
Soapbox
Best Practices
Apply today for a FREE subscription to CIO Magazine!
Mon, Jun 30, 2008 17:29 EDT
|
Posted by: Bruce Dresser in Best Practices Topic: Infrastructure
Current Rating: |
At first glance, sourcing agents from multiple call centers — which mix in-house, remote, and outsourced call center agents to create a distributed, virtual call center — would seem to promise cost savings and flexibility. Agents from across town or across the globe can be quickly added to or subtracted from the call center agent pool to respond quickly to changing business needs.
A closer look, however, reveals underlying risks that can actually undermine the objective of better and more flexible customer service. Sourcing from multiple centers can damage customer loyalty and brand as well as jeopardize cost savings, especially when the call centers lack a common hosted infrastructure. Without a common hosted infrastructure:
Agents can’t deliver consistent customer service because they lack the same set of tools, often driving a company’s most valuable customers to take their business elsewhere.
Companies (and their customers) face unpredictable, unmanageable response times.
Management’s lack of complete agent visibility creates the inability to reconfigure and reallocate call distribution in real time and when needed, which keeps cost per call artificially high.
Siloed sites on different platforms within the multi-site deployments require separate upgrades, maintenance and staffing, which drain savings sought by having multi-sourced agents.
How do companies like American Express Incentive Services (AEIS) minimize the risks and maximize the rewards of customer service through a multi-sourced call centers? With a common hosted call center platform.
Improving service availability
One of the attractions of multi-sourcing is reduced risk of call center downtime, yet companies that engage in sourcing agents from multiple call centers without a common hosted platform still expose their call center operations to heightened risk. Disparate platforms cause each agent pool to be invisible to one another and, in most cases, to call center management, necessitating the blind distribution of calls. This lack of visibility reduces the company’s ability to view problems at outsourced locations and to respond to them with timely remedies.
For instance, AEIS runs four major call centers in the United States and the Philippines that handle several hundred thousand calls per month, with call volumes seasonally increasing to nearly triple that amount during the fourth quarter. Prior to implementing a multi-site, multi-sourced hosted contact center from Echopass in all their locations, AEIS couldn’t shift excess capacity from one center to another because it didn’t have visibility of all its agents. AEIS was penalized for overstaffing in one call center while another center had call-abandon rates of 30 percent.
With a common hosted platform, AEIS dynamically routes calls to the best available agent location, based on the current status of all agent locations and queues. No matter what location, skills-based routing coupled with complete agent visibility ensures calls are routed seamlessly and answered promptly. As the environment changes — as more agents become available at one location, for example, and capacity drops at another — call distribution automatically adjusts to the new realities.
In addition, because call center managers with a common hosted platform have real-time visibility into the status of the entire agent pool at all locations as well as the entire call queues, they can perform load balancing and maximize asset utilization to deliver a higher level of service at a lower level of staffing.
Achieving service consistency
Companies running disparate call centers risk delivering inconsistent customer service. Tool deployment delays, business intelligence obstacles, and other differences among call center platforms mean service levels can fluctuate on a call-by-call basis, depending on which pool of agents a caller reaches.
When these systems are out of sync with each other, the in-house, remote and outsourced agents risk giving callers conflicting or contradictory information. Similarly, an agent’s access to
Very good article and one that is at least discussed in large corporations and even small/mid-sized businesses more and more frequently everyday.
One case in point is Dell. Dell moved their entire call center model to an outsourced service only to realize that with all the customer complaints and dissatisfaction with service resolution, they at least listened to part of the complaints, the Corporate Client. While I'm sure that the corporate client makes up a considerable part of Dell's clientele, they failed to realize that that corporate clientele becomes home users as well. In that point what they have failed to do is treat the entire solution and in my opinion just put a band aide on the issue. In which Dell has suffered many setbacks resulting in that decision.
My advice to any company wanting to outsource, make sure you know your customers, services that you are willing to outsource, and tolerance levels that you are willing to accept. If you notice any deviation on any of these levels, act quickly and as much under the radar as possible.
Darrin Brillhart
Network Manager
Thermo Fisher Scientific North America Microbiology