Net Neutrality Advocates: Not Just Your Average Hippie
Yesterday’s filing of statements from hundreds of internet users and advocacy groups to the FCC reopened the net neutrality debate, and I say it’s about time.
For a couple years now, my worries about the net neutrality debate have been two fold. First, I’ve feared it would end up being portrayed in the same 2-dimensional way all political issues in D.C. get presented these days to the public. In one corner, big business telecommunications companies (and the politicians in their pocket) will say no regulation is needed when it comes to the internet and to prevent them from charging what they like flies in the face of American ideals. In the other corner, the detractors will be a bunch of long-haired, scruffy tech hippies that don’t know anything about free-market capitalism and should go live in a commune up in Northern California.
But this debate is much more dynamic than that. The beauty is, now the hippies have billion dollar corporations (Google, for one) in their corner who care very much about a free and open market on the web, so the telecoms might not be able to buy this decision like they’d probably hoped. Certainly, the politicians who have been compliant and willing pawns for the telecom's cause have not exactly articulated very good arguments. Meanwhile, the Googles of the world have been supported by people such as Timothy Berners-Lee, who might just know a thing or two about the web. And even some politicians in congress have showed they might hopefully understand the debate.
Yesterday, hundreds of groups and internet users argued the merits of keeping the internet the same for all, but conservative advocacy groups and telecoms fought back, asserting that there is no need for regulation because they haven’t charged more yet for competing content.
So does that mean we should just wait for them to start doing so? Well, some people think we should roll over and let them because it would fly in the face of free market economics not to. But that argument is so grossly oversimplified because it ignores, with great irony, the fact that equal access to the internet allows for low barriers to entry, which, in turn, allows more and more start-ups and new companies to prosper. If that isn’t American, I don’t
Print
For a couple years now, my worries about the net neutrality debate have been two fold. First, I’ve feared it would end up being portrayed in the same 2-dimensional way all political issues in D.C. get presented these days to the public. In one corner, big business telecommunications companies (and the politicians in their pocket) will say no regulation is needed when it comes to the internet and to prevent them from charging what they like flies in the face of American ideals. In the other corner, the detractors will be a bunch of long-haired, scruffy tech hippies that don’t know anything about free-market capitalism and should go live in a commune up in Northern California.
But this debate is much more dynamic than that. The beauty is, now the hippies have billion dollar corporations (Google, for one) in their corner who care very much about a free and open market on the web, so the telecoms might not be able to buy this decision like they’d probably hoped. Certainly, the politicians who have been compliant and willing pawns for the telecom's cause have not exactly articulated very good arguments. Meanwhile, the Googles of the world have been supported by people such as Timothy Berners-Lee, who might just know a thing or two about the web. And even some politicians in congress have showed they might hopefully understand the debate.
Yesterday, hundreds of groups and internet users argued the merits of keeping the internet the same for all, but conservative advocacy groups and telecoms fought back, asserting that there is no need for regulation because they haven’t charged more yet for competing content.
So does that mean we should just wait for them to start doing so? Well, some people think we should roll over and let them because it would fly in the face of free market economics not to. But that argument is so grossly oversimplified because it ignores, with great irony, the fact that equal access to the internet allows for low barriers to entry, which, in turn, allows more and more start-ups and new companies to prosper. If that isn’t American, I don’t
What is Tech Briefcase?
TechBriefcase is a new, free service where IT Professionals can Search, Store and Share IT white papers and content like this. Learn more
Bookmark content
Speed up your research efforts with content across the web.
Search and Store
Find the white papers you need. Create folders for any topic.
View Anywhere
Open your briefcase on your iPhone, tablet or desktop. Share with colleagues.
Most Discussed Posts
Cloud computing has emerged as one of the most significant game changers to hit the technology landscape in the past 20 years. With this massive expansion of the cloud, the perception of the IT organization is shifting from a utility player to a change agent. This eBook breaks down five ways progressive organizations are using cloud-based IT Management solutions to help drive innovation and become more strategic, including: adding visibility and analytics, speeding up time-to-value, lowering costs, improving prioritization, and providing a blueprint for future cloud deployments.
Read the white paper to see how IBM helped Citigroup deliver new services and enhancements to their 200 million customers faster.
There are 3 ways to modernize legacy applications: rewrite completely, acquire packaged solutions or migrate existing code. This paper explains why it's best to migrate and how IBM® Rational® software can help.
Accommodating specific lines of business can result in a hybrid ecosystem of applications and servers. The resulting complexity of this architecture makes for an environment that is costly to maintain and difficult to change when addressing new challenges.
This whitepaper will help you to define a mobile device passcode policy. Security managers must attempt to reconcile two opposing goals. They must: 1) create a passcode policy that is strong enough to protect the device if it is lost or stolen, while: 2) not annoying users with needless length or complexity.
This whitepaper, authored by The Radicati Group, looks at the key reasons organizations should consider moving to a cloud-based archiving solution. Email archiving solutions enable organizations to store, monitor, and collect electronic data exchanged by their users to comply with internal policies and regulations.
ATERNITY will showcase a 30-minute demo on how Fortune 500 companies are leveraging its award-winning FPI Platform to deliver a user-centric approach to Proactive IT Management.
For businesses to move forward and tap into the ever-expanding universe of Internet users and network-enabled devices, it's critical to learn how to make the transition to IPv6. Learn the critical steps your organization must take to make a seamless transition-and keep your business world connected.
Learn how IT teams can protect against spear phishing tactics. Harry Sverdlove, chief technology officer of Bit9 offers a frank discussion about spear phishing - the most common technique used in today's advanced attacks.
Learn how to build a solid business case for your migration to Red Hat Enterprise Linux so you can run leaner, innovate faster, be more flexible and own the New Now.
Social media isn't about you; it's about everything around you. As you consider how your customers want to communicate with you, social media is something that can't be ignored. But what should your strategy be? Is social media "just another channel?" What kind of a plan makes sense for your contact center and for your customers? Join our experts as they share their insight and research results.
Hardware tokens were a popular method of strong authentication in past years but the cumbersome provisioning and distribution tasks, high support requirements and replacement costs have limited their growth. The additional log-in steps that hardware tokens require and the resulting user frustrations have limited adoption and make them impractical for larger scale partner and customer applications.
Sponsored Links
