Apply today for a FREE subscription to CIO Magazine!
Wed, Sep 5, 2007 13:07 EDT
|
Posted by: C.G. Lynch in News Topic: ApplicationsBlog: The Collaboratory
Current Rating: |
When Yahoo went public in April of 1996, no one suggested that Microsoft take the internet start-up under its wing. Wall Street would have laughed at such an idea.
Eleven years later, such a move is not only a possibility, it might be vital for both companies.
According to the New York Times' Dealbook, rumors of a potential merger between Microsoft and Yahoo have resurfaced because of a recent report by Robert Peck, an analyst at Bear Stearns, who contended that the internet company would be an attractive acquisition candidate for either a technology vendor or a traditional media company.
Let's hope that 1) it's a technology company rather than a traditional media company (which would surely ruin Yahoo) and 2) that the company would be one that knows something about software (like Microsoft). Such a merger would ensure better competition among the internet and software companies of the future in a climate that, as it stands now, Google seems poised to dominate pretty one-sidedly.
That must sound strange: Microsoft should merge with another company to become more competitive. Don't they still dominate the software landscape?
The short answer is yes, but there are some more complex factors at play here:
Google already dominates search and ads. And though it has exerted only minimal pressure on Microsoft's domination of the office productivity software space, some recent announcements indicate that Google has plans to be a force there as well. For one, its addition of Sun Star Office to Google Pack was a clear shot across Microsoft's bow, offering its customers a place to author documents other than in Microsoft Office (and for free, by the way). And two, it acquired Postini in order to offer CIO-worthy security for e-mail.
Those moves, coupled with the fact that Google doesn't have the legacy baggage of starting their business before the web became a force in business, makes them a strong and nimble competitor in the software space.
As it stands now, Microsoft doesn't have that same luxury, but it's working to counter it, and a deal with Yahoo would be a good shot in the arm in that endeavor.
For Microsoft, the advantage of a merger with Yahoo is they could climb the ladder a bit in search (Yahoo is still number two) and work with a company who has never done business without the web being central to its business model. Though Microsoft's new strategy of offering software plus services might be a good temporary solution to wean tons of their customers and partners off the old install and packaged software model, Yahoo's strong consumer presence on the web would offer Microsoft a good springboard to develop more web-only applications that operate on a free or very cheap model.
So do you Yahoo -- or, I mean, like the idea of this deal?
Why merge Microsoft and Yahoo.. MSN certainly has had the ability to overshadow and ourperform Yahoo for years.. While keeping a finger in the pie and eye on market directon, both Yahoo and Google may be fleeting technology steps for information management as work by IBM to minipulate atoms for new storage capacities progresses (Moore's Law). Another reason this idea may not play is to look only a few years back to Time Warner's merger with AOL. Nice for the stock market players who put the deal together, bad for both companies who had to operate the structure.. Microsoft does have the capital to invest, make mistake and recover but why go there in first place.. Merging with AT&T for broader communication power or Time Warner for content and distribution may be better choices..
The problem is that MSN has already had years of trying to beat Yahoo, but without success. They even had the default homepage pointing to MSN, but people still uses Yahoo and Google.
The whole issue here is the fact that all three companies have been around for quite some time now, but neither Yahoo! nor MSN has had any success in removing Google from its dominating position. Both the companies have tried to gain the number 1 spot in the Information Management sector but they just couldn't. MSN is trying to do it on its own through its Live search initiative but it cant really cut the cake. The only way for Microsoft to beat Google in its own area is to acquire the second largest name in that field, as Microsoft always tends to do. If it acquires Yahoo!, it can combine its resources, and should be able to grab the number 1 spot from Google.
Google has proved that it is not an easy opponent to beat, as its got Microsoft and Yahoo! scurrying about looking for ways to compete.
The recent interconnection of Yahoo! Messenger and Windows Live Messenger networks should be considered at this point. Did these companies need to merge their networks? They've dealt with pretty much every other messenger service out there, and still came out as the most popular, but ever since Google launched Gmail and Google Talk, they've been running around worried, and merged finally, after years of minor modifications and changes.