Apply today for a FREE subscription to CIO Magazine!
Thu, Oct 23, 2008 19:32 EDT

|
Posted by: Esther Schindler in Questions Topic: IT Organization ManagementBlog: You're the Boss
Current Rating: |
The word is that the next president of the United States will invest heavily in technology, and at least one candidate has already discussed choosing a Chief Technology Officer to lead the charge. Who do you think would be right for the job?
I'm busy reading Joel Garreau's 2005 book, Radical Evolution (which, by the way, is wonderful so far). In one section, Garreau describes DARPA's goals to "accelerate the future into being." (You remember DARPA: That wacky government agency that, among other things, invented Arpanet, which you now know as the Internet.) Garreau writes, "One program manager, in his DARPA job interview, was asked to describe where he thought science would be in 20 years. Then he was asked whether he would like to try to make it happen in three."
I don't need to tell this crowd about the impact that computer technology has on business, and about the challenges it represents. More and more, I think, we are all being asked to "make it happen" in three years, sometimes without enough time to consider the consequences. It makes sense to me that the U.S. Government should have someone whose job it is to think deep thoughts about these matters, to warn about societal impacts, and so forth. Whoever winds up in the oval office (and, as with my earlier blog post about the management styles of recent U.S. presidents, this question is not about your choices for that position), I want someone whom I can trust to find that ever-so-wobbly balance between technological possibilities, security-versus-privacy, implementation logistics... in short, the hard stuff. I'm just not sure who the person should be.
Fortunately, others are already thinking about that question. BusinessWeek's Tom Lowry wrote an article a few days ago, identifying several candidates he believes are on the short list for U.S. Chief Technology Officer, at least if Barak Obama is elected. Lowry says that candidates who would be considered for the job, according to Washington insiders, include Vint Cerf, Google's "chief Internet evangelist," Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, Amazon's CEO Jeffrey Bezos and Ed Felten, "a prominent professor of computer science and public affairs at Princeton University." I'm not convinced that these are the right people; but then, I'm not wholly convinced they're wrong, either.
However, I don't think that the "kingpins of industry" are the right people for this job, whether that's Bezos or Ballmer (aside from whatever I think of Ballmer's and Microsoft's corporate behavior). The rules and motivations that enable someone to serve stockholders—that is, where the key question in evaluating technology is, "Can we sell this at a profit?"—are not what we need here. That's an honorable question; it's just not the most appropriate for this job.
A U.S. CTO has to be aware of what's currently possible, even if it's not "cooked" yet. He or she needs to be aware of current trends, whether that's cloud computing or the impact of Gen Y technology expectations on enterprise IT hiring. To provide useful advice to the president, that individual needs to have non-ivory-tower-academic vision (to know what's feasible, likely and capable of implementation), legal training (for all the intellectual property issues that technology innovation brings) and enough street smarts to predict possible outcomes. The right individual has to understand predictability and also think at right angles to the expected. For example, we need someone who, had a US CTO position existed in 1992, might have asked, "What can or should we do with the Internet infrastructure to prevent misuse
Tough call, who is far seeing and far reaching and technically astute as well?
Definitely rules out Balmer, he's a sales guy.
Bezos? Good business, but that doesn't equate to technical.
Mark Cuban? hmmm, not right attitude but a decent mix of both perhaps.
Tim Berners Lee? Maybe
Linus Torvaldes? Interesting too.
Ray Ozzie? Gets my vote, but I believe in sharing, something most politicians dislike.
Pete Townshend or Neil Young? to name some musicians that have been ahead of the curve.
Douglas Adams would also get a vote, but sadly he left us a few years back.
Lastly, Bill Gates, love him or hate him.
I see it more as a group of people from various areas because one person should not shape our digital future. There is a creative part to it, which many lack, and a technical part which others have.
Put it together and you may get some place.
Esther:
The key here is how you define the role of a US government CTO. If the role is to serve as the President's principal advisor on information technology, then maybe the Council of Economic Advisors would be an interesting model. Here is their “job" description from their web site:
“The Council of Economic Advisors (CEA) was established by the Employment Act of 1946 to provide the President with objective economic analysis and advice on the development and implementation of a wide range of domestic and international economic policy issues.
The CEA includes three members who are appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The President shall designate one of the members as Chairman. The duties and functions of the CEA include:
1.to assist and advise the President in the preparation of the Economic Report;
2.to gather timely and authoritative information concerning economic developments and economic trends, both current and prospective, to analyze and interpret such information for the purpose of determining whether such developments and trends are interfering, or are likely to interfere, with the achievement of such policy, and to compile and submit to the President studies relating to such developments and trends;
3.to appraise the various programs and activities of the Federal Government for the purpose of determining the extent to which such programs and activities are contributing, and the extent to which they are not contributing, to the achievement of such policy, and to make recommendations to the President with respect thereto;
4.to develop and recommend to the President national economic policies to foster and promote free competitive enterprise, to avoid economic fluctuations or to diminish the effects thereof, and to maintain employment, production, and purchasing power;
5.to make and furnish such studies, reports thereon, and recommendations with respect to matters of Federal economic policy and legislation as the President may request.”
Not a bad model to be thinking about, with some obvious changes in language, as a job description for a US government CIO.
Bill
William A. Crowell
Principal
Magellan Associates, LLC
www.magellan-associates.com
You can contact me by clicking on my name and then click the "contact" tab.
Definitely Bill Gates
1. He has enough money to stay independent
2. He has enough courage to say what he really think
3. He has enough followers and opponents to make it interesting
4. As a matter of fact, he had this position already so he knows the job ;-)
5. You will use Vista anyway as a core desktop technology, so the strategy is there
6. And there are no other candidates who really know how Windows works ...
More seriously, governments will not be able to drive technology, while they can kill some attempts by regulations. It is a business issue.