Rants
Questions
Soapbox
Best Practices
Apply today for a FREE subscription to CIO Magazine!
Thu, Jun 14, 2007 19:47 EDT

|
Posted by: Fred Hapgood in News Topic: ApplicationsBlog: Tomorrow's Buzz Today
Current Rating: |
Distributed sensing is the least famous member of the architectural family composed of distributed computing (seti@home), distributed storage (OceanStorage), and distributed bandwidth (BitTorrent).
As you might guess from the name, the concept involves networking large numbers of fixed and/or mobile sensing points, collecting and analyzing data generated by those points, and then (usually) redistributing the results with others.
A very cool if highly specialized example is networking hundreds of hobbyist seismographs, thus making it possible to watch an earthquake develop over large areas in real time (at a resolution of one pixel per instrument). Another might be networking home weather stations in a neighborhood to get a picture of the behavior of the atmosphere over small scales -- so-called microclimates. Or using the actual routes driven by real people to improve the driving instructions given by online maps. Right now these routes are calculated by algorithms that assume all miles are equal. As we all know, this is far from the case -- sometimes a longer route is far more efficient. If cars could send GPS data collected during their travels direct to the mapping sites, those sites could evaluate choices made by real drivers by measuring how quickly their cars actually traversed given segments. Such information would make driving directions much more useful.
A major application of distributed sensing is its potential to put urban planning, traffic engineering, and crowd control, both in and outside buildings, on a far more empirical basis. Imagine for instance that you wanted to know the full profile of all the acoustic experiences people are exposed to during their entire day. Recruited participants, paid or unpaid, could download a bit of software to their cell phones, which would then send snapshots of the ambient sound levels experienced by the volunteers once a second, every second, during the entire day.
As both amateur and professional historians know all too well, typically the largest fraction of the life of a city goes totally undocumented. Buildings rise and fall, and neighborhoods change radically, with no sign of these changes appearing on a retrievable or accessible photograph. The right kind of networking among GPS-enabled camera phones, would allow people interested in this project to document a city automatically, just by using their cameras in public. Anytime anyone took a picture in front of 50 Main St., that picture would go into some archive somewhere (bound by whatever privacy restrictions were imposed by the photographer).
This is certainly a field which I had never considered, but it seems to me that it is the natural evolution of what is already being implemented on a smaller scale. Large buildings have sensors in several areas to keep climate control at a reasonable level, and other such 'simple' concepts. It is merely a matter of preparing a wide network of such things for a company.
Can you imagine a weather company that, instead of one large radar, had a series of small, dedicated locations which would watch local network patterns, as described in the previous post? If nothing, the amount of research-valuable data collected by such an endeavor would be astonishing.
Or the integration of a camera system in multiple parts of a building or area that would be able to recognize the faces of those who pass the cameras and recognize that what passes one is the same person as what passes another.
Or even something so simple as tracking traffic or heat produced in a city in such a way that would allow for better road planning. Could it act 'intelligently' in the way traffic affects streetlights to keep traffic down?
I'd like to see how this goes, and what other uses this would have.
Marty Kerby
Secure-24
> I'd like to see how this goes, and what other > uses this would have.
This is one of those technologies where the list of applications just goes on forever. A personal favorite is using interferometry to link all the amateur astronomers and their telescopes in a given hemisphere together to make a single instrument with a virtual mirror thousands of miles wide. That would be more than a terrestial planet finder -- it would be an extrasolar structure finder. I haven't done the numbers but I bet it would be able to detect cities on planets hundreds of light years away.
I really liked your article and it reminded me of some very intriguing technologies being developed in MIT. However, then you completely lost me with your comment regarding the “extrasolar structure finder.” It seems to me that linking telescopes would enable greater resolution, but how does it increase the range of what we can see?
Resolution and range are the same properties, only inverted. If you increase the light gathering power of a telescope you can either see objects further away at a given resolution or objects at a given distance at a higher resolution. (But not both).
I apologize for not making this clearer.