Rants
Questions
Soapbox
Best Practices
Apply today for a FREE subscription to CIO Magazine!
Fri, May 9, 2008 15:52 EDT
|
Posted by: Anonymous in Best Practices Topic: IT Organization Management
Current Rating: |
When setting up a security organization within the Office of the CIO, is there an organizational structure that is most effective when integrating Policy Development and Assurance with the day to day Security Services delivery operation?
What are the strengths and weaknesses of separtaing Policy Development, Compliance, and Assurance staff from the operational Security staff?
Personally I have seen everything: Integrated teams being resposnible for different groups or different teams being responsible for different themes. I do not think that there is a silver bullet for that. It is more about how and whether the teams talk to each other. It is important that we learn from incidents we have and that Operational Security can influnece the policy and vice verca
Just my 2cents
Roger Halbheer
Chief Security Advisor EMEA
Microsoft Corporation
I think how any group is organized depends heavily on the culture and make up of that group. It is possible to have a highly centralized group that dictates policies if the culture is very top down. If you have a more organic model to your orgainization, you may have to push things into various areas with a more distributed model of organization. There is no ONE RIGHT model.