Rants
Questions
Soapbox
Best Practices
Apply today for a FREE subscription to CIO Magazine!
Tue, Sep 11, 2007 10:54 EDT

|
Posted by: Jeff Jones in Best Practices Topic: InfrastructureBlog: Security by Numbers
Current Rating: |
"e-Crime is not a technology problem, it is a crime problem."
I was at the Security Standard in Chicago this morning at the John Gallant and Scott Charney fireside chat and heard the above quote as part of the discussion.
I've been thinking about this since then and it strikes me that thinking about security this way can provide some insights and benefits.
For example, in the latest e-Crime survey results, out today, security spending is down from the previous year, though most folks surveyed (69%) felt they were well-prepared to face security issues. Is this a trend? Does shrinking security budgets mean that lack of large outbreaks in the past 2 years is making people complacent about security?
I don't know.
However, as we're fond of saying in the industry, security isn't a problem you can "fix". There is no finish line, it is an ongoing process to manage risk appropriately.
If we look at the physical world of crime, there are ebbs and flows in funding. If a lot of people are out of work, crime may go up and staffing of law enforcement may need to be comparably higher. Similarly, in a period of peace and prosperity, crime may go down and law enforcement funding may also go down.
So, maybe spending on computer and network security budgets (fighting e-Crime) is a natural process as well, with ebbs and flows, never reaching zero, but sometimes pulling back after periods of higher investment. I like this as a model, because it makes it easier to explain to management teams why nobody has yet "solved" the security problem.
Of course, a more exciting benefit to me is the fact that if fighting malicious attackers is a crime problem, then that makes us all crime-fighters - maybe my childhood goal of being a SuperHero when I grew up isn't completely out of reach ...