Career Connection
About this Blog:
Insight and advice to help you carve your way in the cut-throat business world.
Layoffs: Calculating the Odds You'll Lose Your Job
"Will I still have a job tomorrow?"
With the U.S. economy in a far-reaching recession and companies announcing layoffs seemingly every day, that question looms large in every working person's mind.
Obviously, some employees are at greater risk of losing their jobs than others. What's not so clear is how to calculate that risk. So for the past several months, I've wanted to come up with some kind of risk assessment that would help IT professionals (really, any professional) get an objective handle on their odds of getting laid off.
You may be wondering why anyone would want to determine their likelihood of losing their job. I think a 'layoff risk assessment calculator' could be helpful. A lot of people worry unnecessarily about getting laid off. And a lot of people who do get laid off are completely blindsided by it.
A risk assessment for layoffs could help IT professionals determine whether they're at high- or low risk of losing their jobs, so that low-risk professionals can rest easy and carry on with their work, and so that high-risk employees can be proactive and prepare themselves emotionally, professionally and financially for when and if their jobs get cut.
My problem: I have no idea how to create such a risk assessment. I developed a list of variables that I think could indicate someone is likely to get laid off. I made another list of variables that could indicate someone is unlikely to get laid off. These lists are based on my own knowledge and experience, and on conversations I had with two CIOs who shared with me their approaches to deciding which jobs will be eliminated during layoffs.
My goal is to develop an accurate and plausible assessment—one that will really help people get a grip on their futures. But coming up with an assessment like this is difficult for a variety of reasons. So I need your help.
Take a look at my lists below and let me know which variables you would add to or subtract from either list. Also let me know if you think certain variables should be weighed more heavily than others, and how you think the assessment should be structured. I'm thinking of structuring it like a quiz, where people give themselves points for each negative variable (e.g. each strike against them) and subtract points for each positive variable; people with high scores are then highly likely to be laid off and people will lower scores are less likely to be laid off. Let me know what you think.
And again, keep in mind that the goal of this assessment is to help people, not to scare people.
Variables that Could Indicate Someone Is Likely to Get Laid Off
1. Your employer is not meeting its financial plan.
2. Your salary is at the high-end of the pay scale for your profession or function.
3. A position or function you help support has been eliminated or restructured.
4. You work on a project that has been cut or that you sense is going to be cut.
5. You gossip or complain a lot.
6. The work you do is mundane or repetitive in nature (e.g. re-setting passwords or setting
Print
With the U.S. economy in a far-reaching recession and companies announcing layoffs seemingly every day, that question looms large in every working person's mind.
Obviously, some employees are at greater risk of losing their jobs than others. What's not so clear is how to calculate that risk. So for the past several months, I've wanted to come up with some kind of risk assessment that would help IT professionals (really, any professional) get an objective handle on their odds of getting laid off.
You may be wondering why anyone would want to determine their likelihood of losing their job. I think a 'layoff risk assessment calculator' could be helpful. A lot of people worry unnecessarily about getting laid off. And a lot of people who do get laid off are completely blindsided by it.
A risk assessment for layoffs could help IT professionals determine whether they're at high- or low risk of losing their jobs, so that low-risk professionals can rest easy and carry on with their work, and so that high-risk employees can be proactive and prepare themselves emotionally, professionally and financially for when and if their jobs get cut.
My problem: I have no idea how to create such a risk assessment. I developed a list of variables that I think could indicate someone is likely to get laid off. I made another list of variables that could indicate someone is unlikely to get laid off. These lists are based on my own knowledge and experience, and on conversations I had with two CIOs who shared with me their approaches to deciding which jobs will be eliminated during layoffs.
My goal is to develop an accurate and plausible assessment—one that will really help people get a grip on their futures. But coming up with an assessment like this is difficult for a variety of reasons. So I need your help.
Take a look at my lists below and let me know which variables you would add to or subtract from either list. Also let me know if you think certain variables should be weighed more heavily than others, and how you think the assessment should be structured. I'm thinking of structuring it like a quiz, where people give themselves points for each negative variable (e.g. each strike against them) and subtract points for each positive variable; people with high scores are then highly likely to be laid off and people will lower scores are less likely to be laid off. Let me know what you think.
And again, keep in mind that the goal of this assessment is to help people, not to scare people.
Variables that Could Indicate Someone Is Likely to Get Laid Off
1. Your employer is not meeting its financial plan.
2. Your salary is at the high-end of the pay scale for your profession or function.
3. A position or function you help support has been eliminated or restructured.
4. You work on a project that has been cut or that you sense is going to be cut.
5. You gossip or complain a lot.
6. The work you do is mundane or repetitive in nature (e.g. re-setting passwords or setting
Most Discussed Posts
Cloud computing has emerged as one of the most significant game changers to hit the technology landscape in the past 20 years. With this massive expansion of the cloud, the perception of the IT organization is shifting from a utility player to a change agent. This eBook breaks down five ways progressive organizations are using cloud-based IT Management solutions to help drive innovation and become more strategic, including: adding visibility and analytics, speeding up time-to-value, lowering costs, improving prioritization, and providing a blueprint for future cloud deployments.
Read the white paper to see how IBM helped Citigroup deliver new services and enhancements to their 200 million customers faster.
There are 3 ways to modernize legacy applications: rewrite completely, acquire packaged solutions or migrate existing code. This paper explains why it's best to migrate and how IBM® Rational® software can help.
Accommodating specific lines of business can result in a hybrid ecosystem of applications and servers. The resulting complexity of this architecture makes for an environment that is costly to maintain and difficult to change when addressing new challenges.
This whitepaper will help you to define a mobile device passcode policy. Security managers must attempt to reconcile two opposing goals. They must: 1) create a passcode policy that is strong enough to protect the device if it is lost or stolen, while: 2) not annoying users with needless length or complexity.
This whitepaper, authored by The Radicati Group, looks at the key reasons organizations should consider moving to a cloud-based archiving solution. Email archiving solutions enable organizations to store, monitor, and collect electronic data exchanged by their users to comply with internal policies and regulations.
ATERNITY will showcase a 30-minute demo on how Fortune 500 companies are leveraging its award-winning FPI Platform to deliver a user-centric approach to Proactive IT Management.
For businesses to move forward and tap into the ever-expanding universe of Internet users and network-enabled devices, it's critical to learn how to make the transition to IPv6. Learn the critical steps your organization must take to make a seamless transition-and keep your business world connected.
Learn how IT teams can protect against spear phishing tactics. Harry Sverdlove, chief technology officer of Bit9 offers a frank discussion about spear phishing - the most common technique used in today's advanced attacks.
Learn how to build a solid business case for your migration to Red Hat Enterprise Linux so you can run leaner, innovate faster, be more flexible and own the New Now.
Social media isn't about you; it's about everything around you. As you consider how your customers want to communicate with you, social media is something that can't be ignored. But what should your strategy be? Is social media "just another channel?" What kind of a plan makes sense for your contact center and for your customers? Join our experts as they share their insight and research results.
Hardware tokens were a popular method of strong authentication in past years but the cumbersome provisioning and distribution tasks, high support requirements and replacement costs have limited their growth. The additional log-in steps that hardware tokens require and the resulting user frustrations have limited adoption and make them impractical for larger scale partner and customer applications.
Sponsored Links
