Apply today for a FREE subscription to CIO Magazine!
Thu, Aug 23, 2007 11:28 EDT
|
Posted by: miguelppires in Rants Topic: Architecture
Current Rating: |
If I had any doubts that Google Apps poses a serious threat to the software business, they have been dissipated after reading the following article from TechWorld: "Deploy Google Apps, get fired"
Here is the link:
http://www.techworld.com/applications/news/index.cfm?newsid=9877
In short, the author talks about a report from the Burton Group which describes why the set of applications (and associated hosting services) provided by Google just don't cut it for large-entreprise use although for SMB and even universities its use is, however, seen as appropriate.
Although this is debatable and I am sure many would take a stab at debunking the argument exposed, I don't find it particularly surprising and so should no one.
What this article does (although it does not recognize it) is merely to expose Google Apps for what it is: a disruptive technology.
Disruptive technologies start out as really shabby versions of existing software applications (such as Office) which are laden with functionality that 80% of the users do not use such as:
- "Google Docs does not support a table of contents, headers, footers, automatic creation of footnotes or end notes."
- "Google Spreadsheets does not support some of the more esoteric functions within formulas (eg, database functions), and cannot hide rows or columns."
So what? It is not supposed to do that anyway...
Furthermore, what characterizes disruptive technologies is the fact that they appeal to the less demanding users that have been overshot by the overwhelming amount of functionality that they have to pay for with Microsoft Office - i.e. the schools, the universities and the home users
These are users that really don't care about nifty functionalities that a minority uses and are not willing to pay for them.
The report ends by saying that although Microsoft and others will take a hit from this, in the end they will be just fine. This might be true in the short term - another characteristic of disruptive technologies is that the type of customers they attract are the low-margin customers for Microsoft. So, in the short term, Microsoft will actually see its margins improve due to the disappearance of this lousy customers from the customer mix, but as Google Apps improves and it will improve, then the business customers will start migrating to Google Apps AND THEN it will be too late for Microsoft - the floodgates will open...
For starters, I definitely agree that Google apps is a disruptive technology. Though it's features remain limited, it shows that people might start to think twice about the need for expensive and bloated software for the majority of their users.
But the Burton report doesn't do anything to indicate to me that Google Apps won't be a player in the enterprise apps market in the future (to say so, in fact, is just false since they claim to have nearly 1,000 businesses of all sizes signing up each day). The Burton report is a knee-jerk reaction to those who are obsessed with trying to compare Google to Microsoft in the office apps space. They are very different not only in terms of look and functions, but, most importantly, in terms of purpose.
Google apps is made for people to collaborate on projects in a way that's more user friendly than e-mailing each other documents and renaming them haphazardly.
A more pertinent discussion for the Burton report might have been to focus more on Google's addition of Sun Office to Google Pack, which does seem more of a shot across Microsoft's bow. (But to be fair, I'm sure they wrote the report before that news).
I wrote the report you mention, and actually, on pages 48-50, I do discuss former high tech revolutions (electricity, LANs, Netscape), and suggest that there are parallels here. You're correct, this is a disruptive move on Google's part, but at this point I think it's hard to tell how it will play out.
Many analysts think this will be a replay of the Netscape debacle. I'm not so sure (hopefully the folks at Google know their history and won't repeat it). As I note in the report, Google has done the market a service by waking it up to what's possible. However, with others piling in (Salesforce, Cisco/WebEx, Microsoft, startups to be named), I'm not convinced that Google will ultimately win.