Rants
Questions
Soapbox
Best Practices
Apply today for a FREE subscription to CIO Magazine!
Tue, Feb 19, 2008 16:36 EST
|
Posted by: Roger Detzler in Best Practices Topic: Enterprise Management
Current Rating: |
As the most widely used storage medium today, it is no wonder hard drives represent one of the biggest security challenges. Yet despite stricter government data compliance and security mandates, more needs to be done to safeguard end-of-life data. Ensuring the data on a hard drive is completely eliminated before it is disposed, redeployed or donated should be a top priority for every organization. A clear understanding of these methods and their limitations is essential to ensuring the safety of end-of-life data. To help you better understand your options, I’ve summarized them below for your consideration.
Secure Erase Technology
Caution: Many vendors who sell commercial software products use the term “secure erase” incorrectly. They use the term to describe an “erasure that is secure”. However it is important to distinguish this misused marketing term with Secure Erase technology.
In the late 90’s, the hard drive manufacturers called for a global summit to discuss the rapidly growing challenge of properly sanitizing hard drives. The challenge was to develop a means for certifiably sanitizing hard drives beyond forensic reconstruction while retaining the ability to reuse the hard drive. The hard drive industry collaborated with Center for Magnetic Recording Research (CMRR), under the direction of the US National Security Agency (NSA), to meet this challenge. They developed a sanitization standard called Secure Erase. The Secure Erase standard has been implemented by all hard drive manufacturers since 2002. It is embedded in the firmware of all ATA/IDE and SATA hard drives and is recommended by the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST SP 800-88) as a “purge technology”, a step above software overwriting which is characterized as a “clear technology”.
Since it is located in the firmware of the drive, the sanitization procedure is up to 18x faster than commercial software overwrite routines, which have to communicate to the drive through the OS and BIOS. In addition, it is able to purge all sectors of the hard drive as it has direct access to all bad sector tables stored internally on the drive.
Commercial Overwrite Routines
Commercial overwriting tools are designed to write random bits of data on all user accessible sectors of a drive. The software is loaded onto a machine or server to execute the overwrite procedure. Most overwriting tools execute multiple passes for added security. However, even multiple passes does not guarantee complete sanitization. Some overwriting tools are not able to access bad sectors of a hard drive. This leaves recoverable data on these sectors. In addition, software can take an enormous amount of time, usually lacks an automated logging capability for audit purposes and is not a physically secure process. Both public and private sectors have acknowledged the ineffectiveness of software overwriting. One example of this occurred in June of 2007 when the US Defense Security Service disapproved of this methodology as a method for destroying data.
Degaussing Machines
Degaussers produce a strong magnetic field in order to destroy the magnetically recorded data on the hard drive. Degassers have the unfortunate consequence of destroying the read/write head of the hard drive, rendering the hard drive unusable. The original intent of degaussers was for use with non-rigid disks and magnetic tape media. As the sophistication and platter density in most modern hard drives continues to increase so to does the inadequacy of this methodology. Aside from dangers they pose to other nearby electronic equipment there is no way to ensure that the hard drive platter does not contain any
The practical matter here is:
How much effort and what kind of a budget would it take to recover the data on the drive?
Short of a federal level budget (CIA, NSA, etc.) for recovery, there are a number of simple techniques that are rather effective in destroying data
Regarding permanent destruction:
For simple old drives which are too small for practical use in new machines, disassembly and removing the platters is quite sufficient. You can cut them up if needed, or bend them into fun shapes for wind chimes. Give them to the kids to play with in the sand box. (Sand does wonders for a platter surface). Or take them on a cruise, and throw them into the sea between islands, far out from land.
Another simple destructive method is to drill a couple of large holes through the circuit board and the main platters, then let the old drives soak in a bucket of salt water for a month, long enough to ensure a good buildup of corrosion.
These methods are quite effective for anything outside of a governmental budget for recovery purposes.
Erasing with the intent to reuse is somewhat more problematic.
But again, overwriting with random sequences ones or zeroes is quite sufficient before reformatting for use in the new setup.
And drives are inexpensive, so that often it is worth simple replacing the drive and destroying the old
Federal requirements such as HIPAA, Sarbanes-Oxley, etc. require fully documented procedures for disposing of data and a complete chain of custody across a variety of industries; this isn’t limited to just government agencies.
Perhaps it is this simplistic and indifferent attitude that has led to a record year of data security breaches.
I find it quite absurd that you find the methods you listed as satisfactory for non-governmental organizations. The cost to a company who loses sensitive information is astronomical: notifications to customers (letters, email, web and media), legal defense services, criminal investigations, legal audit and accounting fees, call center expenses, public and investor relations and internal investigations just to name a few. In light of this, you can bet that a company is going to spend whatever is necessary to prevent the expenses associated with the above as well the damage that their reputation will suffer from a breach.
Recently, the Poneman Institute released an annual study on the cost of a data breach. They estimated the total cost to be $197 per record lost. Imagine how many millions of records would be on a single hard drive. I don’t think they would be making wind chimes with the platters.
PLEASE!!!!
Roger Detzler (CTO) has never believed a thing that he is saying... and as a matter of fact... laughed at the concept of a 'digital shredder" as not having a market... "it's too expensive for the common man" and EDT has yet to sell any quantity of product into the open market, since 2005.
EDT's founders are all non technical people who have never used a computer... never mind run a high tech company.
EDT's founders have screwed their dealer network and it will come back to haunt them. They screwed their original OEM... EDT has no in-house development/programming/support staff...A shell organization.
Buyer's beware... EDT is living off of angel investors seed capital and free rent... The senior management is making all of the wrong moves...the BOARD NEEDS TO WAKE UP!
You wrote: Roger Detzler (CTO) has never believed a thing that he is saying...
I understand that you disagree fervently with the author of this post. Fine. But there's a difference between "This is how I feel" and "You're wrong | stupid | lying."
This is a professional forum. We're expected to act like grown-ups. If you wouldn't utter your message to Roger's face, under your own identity... then how seriously can a reader here take your opinion?
For more understanding of the guidelines of Advice & Opinion, see A Note from Your BlogMom.