Rants
Questions
Soapbox
Best Practices
Apply today for a FREE subscription to CIO Magazine!
Thu, Jan 29, 2009 15:20 EST

|
Posted by: Shane ONeill in Soapbox Topic: InfrastructureBlog: Eye on Microsoft
Current Rating: |
As someone who wants Microsoft to be cooler, I'm all for them making an aggressive pitch to consumers. I say make Windows 7 a simplified, colorful, fun experience for everyday users. Emphasize how it can store and share music and photos. Keep those potential Mac users from switching. Heck, open up retail stores while you're at it.
But of course Microsoft has to walk the line here. By kowtowing to consumers, it runs the risk of neglecting its core customer, the business user. In a recent interview on CIO.com sister site Network World, Windows blogger and editor of Supersite for Windows Paul Thurrott contends that Microsoft is biting the hand that feeds it by leaning heavily on consumer features with Windows 7. Enterprise needs have been reduced to an afterthought, he says.
This is the opposite of Microsoft's usual route of focusing on businesses more than consumers. I suppose when you're a company that has chosen to be all things to all people, life is a constant balancing act. And so it goes with Windows 7, quite possibly Microsoft's most challenging balancing act ever.
The mantra Microsoft is repeating to the press about Windows 7 is: "We've listened to our customers", implying I guess that it didn't listen to them for Vista. Internet message boards are filled with people who would agree with that.
I recently installed the Windows 7 beta on my personal laptop running Vista Home Premium and you can see right away the consumer friendliness of the OS. And that's a good thing. It's really growing on me: The clean and logical UI of Windows 7 is so much better than XP that it's funny. The Windows 7 taskbar, which gives you major control over your myriad open applications with mouse-over lists that you can click on, puts the random dumping ground that is XP's taskbar to shame.
The interface differences with Vista are more subtle, but I'll save my thoughts on the Windows 7 beta for another post. What's clear is that Windows 7 is just freakin' easier: easier to switch between browsers, to find and share files, to connect to a wireless network, to back up data to an external hard drive, to create a home network, to check security settings. From what I've seen of the beta so far, if you get lost using Windows 7 then maybe you shouldn't be using a computer.
But does an improved user interface help IT pros and business users? Sure it helps, but it doesn't solve their big problems. In his interview, Thurrott accuses Microsoft of not having "much of an enterprise story" with Windows 7. He concedes that Windows 7 has embedded some interesting new enterprise features such as DirectAccess, which allows mobile users to connect to networks without a VPN, and BranchCache, which caches data on a branch office server to limit the data traveling over the WAN. But both of those features are locked to Windows Server 2008 R2 (still in beta) and require upgrades to both Windows 7 and WS2008 R2 in order to work.
"I feel disappointed because it seems some Windows 7 enterprise features are arbitrarily locked to WS2008 R2," Thurrott says. "That's a problem when you are asking corporations to spend a significant sum of money or a lot of effort to upgrade and they have to upgrade their server and client operating systems. It's a tough year for that."
Though this is less a direct criticism of Windows 7, Thurrott believes that some of the OS's enterprise features should be available now in Vista. "I think
I think the deal here is that with so many corporate/enterprise clients holding off on Vista, Windows 7's lack of major new features *is* its biggest feature for corporate customers. It takes the Vista platform everyone skipped, and offers it as a refined, stable, "not Vista" upgrade path from XP/2k. It will bring Vista's features to the corporate world without the Vista stigma. Close compatibility and feature-parity with Vista means there is now a plethora of devices and applications already available to the 7 platform. Commodity PC's have also caught up with Vista's requirements. This combined with the perceived improvement in stability will likely make Windows 7 a much easier sell for Microsoft.
That said, personally the phrase "polished turd" comes to mind when 7 is mentioned.
Who is to say that once 7 Business version is released that it will contain all of what the Enterprise whiners are looking for. Beta...for consumers to Test...if it isnt one thing then it is another...for cryin out loud...MS is doing a fine job I say. They will find that balance for both parties of people and then some other naysayer will find something else to bitch about..use Windows or don't. Bottom line...
Icons without text on the taskbar is nothing earthshattering, That sort of functionality should have been there from the first taskbar ever made. Pathetic attempt in my opinion. Outside of that its all stuff that should have been in Vista. Tag it a new os and make me pay again?
Actually it's being offered free to Vista customers, so no angry man, it's not pathetic.
While the IT guys have to support an OS like Windows 7, the end user is the consumer, all the workers that have PC's on their desks.
So how could Microsoft focus too much on the Consumer? They are the ones that have to deal with how it looks and works day in and day out.