Want to Save $10 Million or More on ERP? Don't Buy Oracle or SAP
You want to play with the ERP big boys (SAP and Oracle), instead of the so-called Tier II ERP providers (Epicor, Infor, Lawson)? Then you better be prepared to pay a lot more ($9 million to $13 million) and plan for a longer implementation (two to three months longer).
Print
And guess what: At the end of, say, your Oracle ERP implementation, your executive team is actually going to be less satisfied with the software's results than it would have been from a Tier II ERP provider.
That's according to new survey results from ERP consultancy Panorama Consulting Group. The data, gathered from December 2005 to November 2008, is culled from 670 participants who have implemented ERP during the last three years. In the study, Tier I providers are SAP, Oracle and Microsoft; Tier II include Epicor, Exact, IFS, Infor, Lawson, NetSuite, and Sage. (To read about NetSuite's 10-year journey to profitability, see "NetSuite's SaaS ERP Story: After 10 Years, an Upstart Finally Turns a Profit.")
Here are some survey highlights (or low lights, depending on which ERP provider you select):
The majority of respondents (77 percent) had chosen a Tier I provider (SAP 35 percent; Oracle 28 percent; and Microsoft: 14 percent). The rest (23 percent) went with the Tier II.
So, what was the total cost of the average EPR implementation? SAP $16.8 million; Oracle $12.6 million; and Microsoft $2.6 million. Tier II average: $3.5 million. (Microsoft's figure is pretty impressive.)
And how long did it take respondents to fully implement the ERP solution? SAP 20 months; Oracle 18.6 months; and Microsoft 18 months. Tier II: 17.8 months.
Now, the multimillion-dollar question: How satisfied are the executive team and users with the ERP solution? SAP 73 percent (Panorama's "satisfaction rating"); Oracle 62 percent; and Microsoft 69 percent. Tier II: 70 percent.
"Tier II vendors have clearly stepped up their strategies to compete with the 'big boys' of Tier I," noted Eric Kimberling, president of Panorama Consulting Group, in announcing the survey results. "But now that the field has more qualified players, the burden is on the buyer."
These survey results are the second part of Panorama's in-depth ERP study. In the first piece, Panorama's data showed that today's ERP rollout has only a 7 percent chance of coming in on time, will probably cost more than what companies estimated, and will likely deliver very unsatisfying results. Which can lead to outright nightmare ERP scenarios or even shareholder angst leading to halted ERP implementations.
All that led me to prognosticate that even with the high importance companies place on their ERP systems today, an ERP backlash is imminent at companies of all shapes and sizes. I think I now need to modify that statement to: "an ERP backlash is imminent at companies using Tier I ERP providers."
Previous Post: Businesses Are Still Crazy for BI After All These YearsNext Post: A Green Global Supply Chain? Yeah, Right. Maybe Next Decade
Most Discussed Posts
Cloud computing has emerged as one of the most significant game changers to hit the technology landscape in the past 20 years. With this massive expansion of the cloud, the perception of the IT organization is shifting from a utility player to a change agent. This eBook breaks down five ways progressive organizations are using cloud-based IT Management solutions to help drive innovation and become more strategic, including: adding visibility and analytics, speeding up time-to-value, lowering costs, improving prioritization, and providing a blueprint for future cloud deployments.
Read the white paper to see how IBM helped Citigroup deliver new services and enhancements to their 200 million customers faster.
There are 3 ways to modernize legacy applications: rewrite completely, acquire packaged solutions or migrate existing code. This paper explains why it's best to migrate and how IBM® Rational® software can help.
Accommodating specific lines of business can result in a hybrid ecosystem of applications and servers. The resulting complexity of this architecture makes for an environment that is costly to maintain and difficult to change when addressing new challenges.
This whitepaper will help you to define a mobile device passcode policy. Security managers must attempt to reconcile two opposing goals. They must: 1) create a passcode policy that is strong enough to protect the device if it is lost or stolen, while: 2) not annoying users with needless length or complexity.
This whitepaper, authored by The Radicati Group, looks at the key reasons organizations should consider moving to a cloud-based archiving solution. Email archiving solutions enable organizations to store, monitor, and collect electronic data exchanged by their users to comply with internal policies and regulations.
ATERNITY will showcase a 30-minute demo on how Fortune 500 companies are leveraging its award-winning FPI Platform to deliver a user-centric approach to Proactive IT Management.
For businesses to move forward and tap into the ever-expanding universe of Internet users and network-enabled devices, it's critical to learn how to make the transition to IPv6. Learn the critical steps your organization must take to make a seamless transition-and keep your business world connected.
Learn how IT teams can protect against spear phishing tactics. Harry Sverdlove, chief technology officer of Bit9 offers a frank discussion about spear phishing - the most common technique used in today's advanced attacks.
Learn how to build a solid business case for your migration to Red Hat Enterprise Linux so you can run leaner, innovate faster, be more flexible and own the New Now.
Social media isn't about you; it's about everything around you. As you consider how your customers want to communicate with you, social media is something that can't be ignored. But what should your strategy be? Is social media "just another channel?" What kind of a plan makes sense for your contact center and for your customers? Join our experts as they share their insight and research results.
Hardware tokens were a popular method of strong authentication in past years but the cumbersome provisioning and distribution tasks, high support requirements and replacement costs have limited their growth. The additional log-in steps that hardware tokens require and the resulting user frustrations have limited adoption and make them impractical for larger scale partner and customer applications.
Sponsored Links
